Comparison of Executive Function Skills of Health Professional Undergraduate and Graduate Students
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare executive function (EF) skills between undergraduate and graduate students using the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity-Students (WCPA-S). The WCPA-S is useful in identifying EF deficits by observing performance scores and strategy use. Participants included a total of 20 students, ages 19-24, enrolled in health professional programs. Using a cross-sectional, two-group comparison research design, differences were analyzed between level of education and any variances between gender and students with or without specific self-reported conditions potentially impairing EF function. Mean, standard deviations, and ANOVAs were used for data analyses. The WCPA-S was administered to each student individually. Each participant completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A).There were no significant differences found between groups for level of education or gender. One significant difference was found between students with and without self-reported conditions in task performance and strategy use of WCPA-S. No significant difference in BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC) scores was found among groups. A weak negative correlation was seen between the GEC and Grade Point Average (GPA). Global executive dysfunction was not predicted by level of education or gender.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijhs.v8n1a2
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare executive function (EF) skills between undergraduate and graduate students using the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity-Students (WCPA-S). The WCPA-S is useful in identifying EF deficits by observing performance scores and strategy use. Participants included a total of 20 students, ages 19-24, enrolled in health professional programs. Using a cross-sectional, two-group comparison research design, differences were analyzed between level of education and any variances between gender and students with or without specific self-reported conditions potentially impairing EF function. Mean, standard deviations, and ANOVAs were used for data analyses. The WCPA-S was administered to each student individually. Each participant completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A).There were no significant differences found between groups for level of education or gender. One significant difference was found between students with and without self-reported conditions in task performance and strategy use of WCPA-S. No significant difference in BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC) scores was found among groups. A weak negative correlation was seen between the GEC and Grade Point Average (GPA). Global executive dysfunction was not predicted by level of education or gender.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijhs.v8n1a2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 415 |
Yesterday | 263 |
This Month | 1322 |
Last Month | 12084 |
All Days | 1944699 |
Online | 115 |